Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Troll
 - June 29, 2013, 13:28:58 PM

John, I believe my ancestors tried to get the English to eat a Haggis....out of revenge

Posted by John Hopkins
 - June 29, 2013, 13:26:11 PM
Quote from: Troll on June 28, 2013, 15:31:19 PM

There's that "France vs U.K" thing, again....What makes you think he took the first one out of it's shell before he ate it?  Who do you suppose was first to eat a lobster?

A lot of this comes from the "Let's see if we can get the foreigners to eat something disgusting by telling them it is a local delicacy"..I think an Arab started it with sheeps eyes..but it could have been a Scot with salt on porrige..

John.

Posted by CDNRatMan
 - June 29, 2013, 11:18:08 AM

 :o  your confused I just asked about dumb a$$'s wearing shorts and sandals to rid in.....and am now learning that the French started the snail craze, and not sure what a Limey has on that subject...lol.......and in OZ they use bubble wrap....

I am going to put my tinfoil hat on and go sit in the corner.....

Posted by nhtrikes
 - June 29, 2013, 05:51:24 AM

I'm laughing so hard now I'm confused. Great string!

Posted by Troll
 - June 28, 2013, 15:31:19 PM

There's that "France vs U.K" thing, again....What makes you think he took the first one out of it's shell before he ate it?  Who do you suppose was first to eat a lobster? 

Posted by John Hopkins
 - June 28, 2013, 13:07:09 PM
Quote from: nhtrikes on June 27, 2013, 15:00:18 PM

Still can't believe New York makes it unlawful to sell/buy a 20 oz. soda,

There is that language thing again..Ok I know 16 oz is what you call a pint and we call 20 oz a pint, and I think you call a soda what we call a carbonated drink IE:- coke, fanta, and other 'fizzy' drinks..so what is the problem with a 20 oz soda..is it too big.. we buy any size from 6 oz to 3 litres..I really don't understand this one..

Then Chief mentioned salt..That has to be a joke..protection of slugs or something..I was wondering about the first Frenchman to eat a snail..do you think he had trouble getting it out of it's shell..then he saw a slug and probably thought it was pre-prepared food..until he put salt on it..

John.

Posted by chief
 - June 28, 2013, 09:49:42 AM

For clarity... only in New York CITY can you not have salt and 20oz drinks... though I thought that stupid law was stayed by the courts. ...

Posted by greenbarn
 - June 27, 2013, 19:55:35 PM

Mr. Trikes, sir.  Please never apologize for speaking the truth.

It's a sad day in the land when someone can sue for the coffee is too hot and I spilled it on my crotch...

Posted by CDNRatMan
 - June 27, 2013, 18:58:30 PM

  Scary part is I am turning into my dad......

No both of you are wrong Canada is the greatest...ok let us start that fight now.....lol.....

You can not buy a 20 oz can of pop in NY...wow that sucks......

Posted by Washbrook
 - June 27, 2013, 18:35:22 PM

nhtrikes: No offence taken by me, you are spot on in many respects, political correctness and the government trying to "bubble wrap" everyone for their own protection is becoming the norm rather that the exception here in Australia, even more than in the USA [I lived in Colorado form 2001 - 2006 so saw a lot of how your system works]. Though I have to state that the people in Australia are the greatest but that's a whole different discussion :) .

PS. I know I'm turning into an old grump.
Posted by Troll
 - June 27, 2013, 17:37:59 PM

Don't apologise....you got it right. The important thing is that the law was overturned by the adults in the room. Bloomberg calls himself an independent, and he is...independent of all common sense. New York is home, I just live in Wisconsin.

Posted by nhtrikes
 - June 27, 2013, 16:40:42 PM

Just re-read my rant. Humblest apologies if I offended anyone, especially anyone here from NY. That was not my intention at all. Just an old NH 'yank' shootin' off his mouth, going deaf and a few misplaced marbles to boot. If I could have, I would have removed the post after I calmed down. Next time I will take a walk, do some deep breathing exercises and count to ten before I start typing! My wife has been telling me I'm turning into an old grump, don't tell her but I think she may be right.  :o    Seriously, for anyone who may have been offended by my comments, please accept my deepest apologies . . .

Posted by nhtrikes
 - June 27, 2013, 15:00:18 PM

The problem with common sense is it not very common anymore, and because of that the government has taken upon itself to pass laws that are suppose to protect people from themselves. Comes at a huge price, freedom. The other problem is the number of self-sufficient people with common sense are now a minority in this country, and the ones that depend on the government for their personal welfare are the majority that is why these laws that take away freedoms are passed and accepted by the majority of the public. We are loosing this battle here in NH as well. Still no helmet law here but it's a matter of time. Still can't believe New York makes it unlawful to sell/buy a 20 oz. soda, God knows I would never, but hell, if I want one  . . .  and people just accept it!!!! Sorry, my blood boils when I see what's happening to this country. The people in this country are still the greatest, that's what makes us, defines us. Not our government! Thanks for letting me rant  :o  This string just struck a nerve. I'll step off my soapbox now . . .

Posted by Troll
 - June 27, 2013, 13:33:40 PM

Personal responsibility is a lot like common sense...those who will, do..those who won't....hmmm what should I say here? You know what I mean, so I'll leave it to your imagination.

Posted by chief
 - June 27, 2013, 12:03:25 PM

Well, I've been in the safety business for a good chunk of time. There are things that MUST be mandated to force your employer, the government, or whomever to provide for a safe living environment. Then there are things you should do to protect yourself. The problem is, the government has encroached into that latter area way too far, IMHO. AND, people ASSUME a lot about the effectiveness of PPE's... personal protective equipment.

A law is not a suitable substitute for personal responsibility IMHO.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk