Vulcan Drifter Riders

DISCUSSIONS => General Discussion => Topic started by: CDNRatMan on June 26, 2013, 16:12:32 PM

Title: Question?
Post by: CDNRatMan on June 26, 2013, 16:12:32 PM
  Just a dumb a$$ question because today I saw it and it bugged me. I left work in my truck to go home change and go to physio. So physio requires me to wear shorts, and I wanted to ride my bike there so I changed into shorts and put a pair of long pants on over them. Got my helmet on and my gloves, only going about 8 blocks away so just wore my T shirt.
  What got my goat today was seeing all the people out riding in shorts, sandals, wife beater shirts or shirtless. No gloves on most people. Have I missed the boat and not kept up or is the rest of them out to lunch?

  GreenBarn be nice.....PC go for it.....
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Troll on June 26, 2013, 16:26:25 PM
We have a poster hanging in the classroom...it depicts a rider in full gear and fool's gear..which do you supposed is which?
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: greenbarn on June 26, 2013, 17:04:03 PM
See, Ratman, you're not understanding one thing:  These are the guys who leave home SURE THEY WON'T BE INVOLVED IN A WRECK.  ???  See, if you were just as sure as THEY were, you could ride half dressed TOO.  (don't take that as an invitation for more pictures...)   ;D

What gets me the most is the guys who haul their girl around half dressed.....  not much respect for their girl, I guess....
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Pilgrim on June 26, 2013, 17:51:04 PM
I see this all the time. I never ride in shorts but I am guilty of riding with a t-shirt.
Not that my legs are more important than my arms...
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: CDNRatMan on June 26, 2013, 19:05:53 PM
  Yes Troll, we had the same poster.........

for my riding I always wear gloves, eye protection, temp and weather decide on long pants/chaps,T shirt/coat/raingear, now my arthritis dictate's footwear, normally boots on all rides, unless I have a bad swelling then sneakers.

Greenbarn you said you want a picture of me in my bikini riding my bike......I'll pm that to you.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: greenbarn on June 26, 2013, 21:03:04 PM
Did I say that??    Well, should take care of the rodent problem in the barn. ::)
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: waltervl on June 27, 2013, 03:20:10 AM
In Europe, in some countries you will get a fine if you don't wear proper motorcycling gear. A helmet allways has to be worn.
I fell one time without wearing a motorcycle pants, and I will not do that again (both falling and not wearing proper pants).
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: DC on June 27, 2013, 07:20:47 AM
I can't see riding without the proper gear, but I see that many peeps do. 

BTW, I just got my summer jacket (in hi-viz).  Fits great.  I'll take it for a ride on the weekend.  I also ordered the CE back armor plate. 

http://www.revzilla.com/product/icon-anthem-mil-spec-mesh-jacket (http://www.revzilla.com/product/icon-anthem-mil-spec-mesh-jacket)
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Washbrook on June 27, 2013, 08:22:47 AM
There has to be some people willing to be organ donors.

If they do not respect themselves enough to wear the gear they take the risk, I for one value my life too much to go undressed.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Troll on June 27, 2013, 09:38:38 AM
  Freedom is what you make of it. As long as we have the freedom to make our own decisions, no matter how bad, we are still free. You can't legislate intelligence...if you could, there would be intelligent legislators....
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: John Hopkins on June 27, 2013, 10:06:27 AM
Quote from: Troll on June 27, 2013, 09:38:38 AM
  Freedom is what you make of it. As long as we have the freedom to make our own decisions, no matter how bad, we are still free.

This is the way it should be..an old chestnut the helmet law..

It is a good sensible law but if we have a choice most of us would not wear a helmet when test riding a motorcycle so that we could hear the engine and any faults before buying..as it stands the police use many of these laws as a way or raising money..

John.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: chief on June 27, 2013, 12:03:25 PM
Well, I've been in the safety business for a good chunk of time. There are things that MUST be mandated to force your employer, the government, or whomever to provide for a safe living environment. Then there are things you should do to protect yourself. The problem is, the government has encroached into that latter area way too far, IMHO. AND, people ASSUME a lot about the effectiveness of PPE's... personal protective equipment.

A law is not a suitable substitute for personal responsibility IMHO.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Troll on June 27, 2013, 13:33:40 PM
Personal responsibility is a lot like common sense...those who will, do..those who won't....hmmm what should I say here? You know what I mean, so I'll leave it to your imagination.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: nhtrikes on June 27, 2013, 15:00:18 PM
The problem with common sense is it not very common anymore, and because of that the government has taken upon itself to pass laws that are suppose to protect people from themselves. Comes at a huge price, freedom. The other problem is the number of self-sufficient people with common sense are now a minority in this country, and the ones that depend on the government for their personal welfare are the majority that is why these laws that take away freedoms are passed and accepted by the majority of the public. We are loosing this battle here in NH as well. Still no helmet law here but it's a matter of time. Still can't believe New York makes it unlawful to sell/buy a 20 oz. soda, God knows I would never, but hell, if I want one  . . .  and people just accept it!!!! Sorry, my blood boils when I see what's happening to this country. The people in this country are still the greatest, that's what makes us, defines us. Not our government! Thanks for letting me rant  :o  This string just struck a nerve. I'll step off my soapbox now . . .
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: nhtrikes on June 27, 2013, 16:40:42 PM
Just re-read my rant. Humblest apologies if I offended anyone, especially anyone here from NY. That was not my intention at all. Just an old NH 'yank' shootin' off his mouth, going deaf and a few misplaced marbles to boot. If I could have, I would have removed the post after I calmed down. Next time I will take a walk, do some deep breathing exercises and count to ten before I start typing! My wife has been telling me I'm turning into an old grump, don't tell her but I think she may be right.  :o    Seriously, for anyone who may have been offended by my comments, please accept my deepest apologies . . .
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Troll on June 27, 2013, 17:37:59 PM
Don't apologise....you got it right. The important thing is that the law was overturned by the adults in the room. Bloomberg calls himself an independent, and he is...independent of all common sense. New York is home, I just live in Wisconsin.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Washbrook on June 27, 2013, 18:35:22 PM
nhtrikes: No offence taken by me, you are spot on in many respects, political correctness and the government trying to "bubble wrap" everyone for their own protection is becoming the norm rather that the exception here in Australia, even more than in the USA [I lived in Colorado form 2001 - 2006 so saw a lot of how your system works]. Though I have to state that the people in Australia are the greatest but that's a whole different discussion :) .


PS. I know I'm turning into an old grump.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: CDNRatMan on June 27, 2013, 18:58:30 PM
  Scary part is I am turning into my dad......

No both of you are wrong Canada is the greatest...ok let us start that fight now.....lol.....

You can not buy a 20 oz can of pop in NY...wow that sucks......
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: greenbarn on June 27, 2013, 19:55:35 PM
Mr. Trikes, sir.  Please never apologize for speaking the truth.

It's a sad day in the land when someone can sue for the coffee is too hot and I spilled it on my crotch...
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: chief on June 28, 2013, 09:49:42 AM
For clarity... only in New York CITY can you not have salt and 20oz drinks... though I thought that stupid law was stayed by the courts. ...
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: John Hopkins on June 28, 2013, 13:07:09 PM
Quote from: nhtrikes on June 27, 2013, 15:00:18 PM
Still can't believe New York makes it unlawful to sell/buy a 20 oz. soda,

There is that language thing again..Ok I know 16 oz is what you call a pint and we call 20 oz a pint, and I think you call a soda what we call a carbonated drink IE:- coke, fanta, and other 'fizzy' drinks..so what is the problem with a 20 oz soda..is it too big.. we buy any size from 6 oz to 3 litres..I really don't understand this one..

Then Chief mentioned salt..That has to be a joke..protection of slugs or something..I was wondering about the first Frenchman to eat a snail..do you think he had trouble getting it out of it's shell..then he saw a slug and probably thought it was pre-prepared food..until he put salt on it..

John.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Troll on June 28, 2013, 15:31:19 PM
There's that "France vs U.K" thing, again....What makes you think he took the first one out of it's shell before he ate it?  Who do you suppose was first to eat a lobster? 
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: nhtrikes on June 29, 2013, 05:51:24 AM
I'm laughing so hard now I'm confused. Great string!
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: CDNRatMan on June 29, 2013, 11:18:08 AM
 :o  your confused I just asked about dumb a$$'s wearing shorts and sandals to rid in.....and am now learning that the French started the snail craze, and not sure what a Limey has on that subject...lol.......and in OZ they use bubble wrap....

I am going to put my tinfoil hat on and go sit in the corner.....
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: John Hopkins on June 29, 2013, 13:26:11 PM
Quote from: Troll on June 28, 2013, 15:31:19 PM
There's that "France vs U.K" thing, again....What makes you think he took the first one out of it's shell before he ate it?  Who do you suppose was first to eat a lobster?

A lot of this comes from the "Let's see if we can get the foreigners to eat something disgusting by telling them it is a local delicacy"..I think an Arab started it with sheeps eyes..but it could have been a Scot with salt on porrige..

John.
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: Troll on June 29, 2013, 13:28:58 PM
John, I believe my ancestors tried to get the English to eat a Haggis....out of revenge
Title: Re: Question?
Post by: DC on July 01, 2013, 07:13:29 AM
Such a bizarre conversation.   ;D  It reminds me when we were kids going to the shore with our parents.  We would wrap potatoes in aluminum foil and put them on the intake manifold.  When we got to the shore we would have baked potatoes waiting for us under the hood.   ;D   8)