Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Troll
 - February 20, 2015, 08:00:02 AM

Sounds like you live in Iowa, John!

Posted by John Hopkins
 - February 19, 2015, 23:42:56 PM

We only have 246,000 miles of roads in Britain so it is not always easy to find a road not already travelled, you have over 3,000,000 miles of roads.. There are only two roads out of my town one north and one south.

John.

Posted by jmbo
 - February 19, 2015, 21:13:21 PM

i guess it all depends on where you ride. I plan all my trips on the back roads.  The more back the roads are the better.  Lucky to hit 70 on most of the roads I travel.  Anything faster and I'm likely to hit a cow around the next turn.

Posted by John Hopkins
 - February 19, 2015, 21:02:12 PM

280 miles on a road often travelled can get pretty boring..

1200 miles in 23 hours doesn't allow much time for looking at the view.

But I made a new year resolution to try my best to keep to the speed limits this year.

John.

Posted by Bucko
 - February 19, 2015, 20:11:19 PM

Me 2!

Posted by DC
 - February 19, 2015, 14:13:15 PM

I'm not one for going really fast.  I like to take my time and enjoy the ride and the views.  Basically, I just putt-putt around on my bike.

Posted by John Hopkins
 - February 19, 2015, 06:46:59 AM

There is a downside, at 107 mph you only get 90 miles to a 16 litre tank and that top speed drops to 90 mph if you have a strong crosswind.

Our national speed limit is 70 mph so there are not many roads left without speed cameras that you can do that sort of speed for a full tank.

John.

Posted by jmbo
 - February 18, 2015, 19:09:25 PM

107 mph? Holy crap! If I rode that fast the wind would blow my beard up over my head and I wouldn't be able to see the road.

Posted by John Hopkins
 - February 18, 2015, 18:18:08 PM

I have had 107 mph from my VN1500, an extra gear could increase that considerably.. Trouble is if they did that nobody would ever want to buy a Harley.

John.

Posted by DC
 - February 18, 2015, 14:40:46 PM

My Drifter seems to have more power than gears it could effectively use.  There's so much power waiting to be tapped in 5th.  It really is begging for a 6th gear.

Posted by jmbo
 - February 07, 2015, 18:27:19 PM

My son and I ride together a lot. He has a Harley-Davidson FLHRI Road King. Both he and I have five speeds but on the highway his bike is alway running at a higher RPM than mine. So I checked the torque spec on the two. They are within 3 lbs of each other but the Drifter hits max tourque at. 2800 vs 3400 RPM. I was told the Drifter's top two gears were overdrive. Perhaps that is why I can cruise at a lower engine speed. I'll check that out next.

Posted by pcarrell
 - February 07, 2015, 11:38:33 AM
Quote from: John Hopkins on February 06, 2015, 17:13:13 PM

I always thought the cams are simply there to move the valves open and closed.

John.

That is correct, but how and when they do that can effect horsepower and torque.
Posted by Troll
 - February 07, 2015, 08:38:22 AM

No, you don't personally do that, unless your are a machinist/engineer. I bought several cams for my 98" shovelhead from different manufacturers and tried them. I still have a few around. I liked the powerband, for instance of the S&S 495, but it didn't make enough peak power for what I wanted. My final decision, with the low end torque and the top end rush I wanted was an Andrews "C" grind but with a custom .590 lift. The timing and such can be altered within a small window by pressing the cam gear off the cam and putting it back on, using a degree wheel to get the numbers right. I had enough time and money, at the time to do this, so I went ahead. The final result was a SuperGlide that ran 11.91 seconds, 115.7 mph in the 1/4 mile, at the top of third gear/6,600 rpm, and was still quite streetable. I sold that bike with 254,000 miles on it when I bought my W-650

Posted by John Hopkins
 - February 06, 2015, 19:16:54 PM
Quote from: Troll on February 06, 2015, 18:11:38 PM

Lift, duration, overlap and timing all effect power output. Depending on how they are done, they can make a usable powerband as wide as a table top, or as narrow and peaky as a few hundred rpm....I experimented with cams in my Hotrod HD. The stock cam makes usable power from just off idle to about 4500, the one I settled on for most uses made power in several steps, starting at 2500-4000, and then a huge spike from 4000 up to 6600....

Not that I will ever do this at my age but I'm curious.. how did you do this..

Did you simply buy several stock cams and grind them to different shapes to change the inlet opening duration and test each one on a dyno, or did you do something completely different? I haven't had that sort of dedication for about 40 years, although I can understand it completely.

John.

Posted by Troll
 - February 06, 2015, 18:11:38 PM

Lift, duration, overlap and timing all effect power output. Depending on how they are done, they can make a usable powerband as wide as a table top, or as narrow and peaky as a few hundred rpm....I experimented with cams in my Hotrod HD. The stock cam makes usable power from just off idle to about 4500, the one I settled on for most uses made power in several steps, starting at 2500-4000, and then a huge spike from 4000 up to 6600....

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk