Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by 49Reo
 - August 12, 2014, 13:51:30 PM

Bingo! Apparently the almighty dollar is more important to some than to others. I'm sure your daughter could answer this correctly, but I am assuming they would have to have leak detection in place, along with slope monitoring to know if and when the face of the dam (berm) begins to move. There is no way this dam "just let go with no warning". There would have been warning signs, such as dampness along the exposed face, 'sinkholes' on the surface of both top and exposed face, etc, as well as any movement of the dam itself (slope monitoring). Not having worked in a mine environment I cannot say for sure, but in the gas industry we have to have such things in place for sumps, tank farms, pipeline right of ways in steep geographical areas; I would assume a lot of these safety measures would be similar. Just sayin'.

Posted by DriftinGirl
 - August 12, 2014, 10:05:16 AM

My daughter is an Enviromental Engineer and says there is no way this could have happened other than the company simply did not listen!!!

Posted by greenbarn
 - August 09, 2014, 21:15:58 PM

That's the first I'd heard of it.  Sounds terrible. 

Posted by 49Reo
 - August 09, 2014, 15:56:32 PM

Especially so considering they had been warned that the dike was leaking.

Posted by CDNRatMan
 - August 09, 2014, 15:09:10 PM

been watching and reading the news on it.....pretty sad.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk