Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Last Edit: September 08, 2010, 18:27:15 PM by chief
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by tpace
 - September 03, 2010, 14:12:14 PM

Glad you asked this question im looking for an answer myself.

Posted by joe1980
 - September 03, 2010, 07:28:30 AM

so does that mean that your factory exhaust had the baffels removed, or are you just saying that it didn't make a difference with the empty longshots?

Posted by Varooom
 - September 03, 2010, 07:06:53 AM

I drove mine 40,000 with stock exhaust, 10,000 with empty Longshots and then back to the stock exhausts and I'm hitting 79,000 this weekend with no loss in performance or any other noticeable changes except I don't get tickets for excessive noise anymore.
Varooom

Posted by joe1980
 - September 03, 2010, 05:38:58 AM

i saw a few posts, and videos about removing the baffles to increase the rumble, but i am still on the fence when it comes to the performance of the bike. some people say the fuel injection compensates for it. some people say it will hinder performance.

can we get some honest anwsers???? at this time i cannot afford to put a new exhaust on my bike, but i also cannot afford to ruin my bike either... please help!!!!!

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk