Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Varooom
 - August 15, 2010, 14:07:01 PM

I have a garage that gets damp often during the year.  I love the blacked out 1999 because it has little chrome to get pitted.
Varooom

Posted by aclone
 - August 15, 2010, 12:54:25 PM

Buy what you like ? Condition who owened the bike and how they took care of it , along with options all figure in to the price.  As for the   black or chrome  I think they are worth the same . ( I like chrome much better than the Dark side). Will include a link to a good web site has drifter for sale from ebay and craigslist.
Mark                                                                                                                                                                 http://www2.jaxed.com/cgi-bin/mash.cgi?cat=cpmoto&itm=kawasaki&loc=&fil=drifter&ys=&ye=&ps=&pe=&pgs=100&submit=++++go++++

Posted by billster50
 - August 14, 2010, 09:38:43 AM

And I'm in the market, what do you think is the better deal, (personally I'm using the 10K and under miles as one of my guidelines) older year or newer year version of the Drifter? Is the black out a rarer bird and hence more valued or does it even matter as in "eye of the owner"?

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk