Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Last Edit: February 19, 2014, 16:59:56 PM by pcarrell
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by jmbo
 - February 19, 2014, 15:33:47 PM

Probably the closest comparison would be the Indian Chief Classic which lists for $18,999. The soft bagger Vintage lists for $20,999 and the big dog Chieftain comes in at $22,999. Naturally this does not include any of the dealer add-ons, do-dads, or senseless charges for doing nothing but turning the lights on but list to list we are talking about $2500 to $3000 between the two bikes.

Posted by pcarrell
 - February 19, 2014, 08:21:47 AM

A new Indian Chief Retro was in the $35k neighborhood last I looked.  $16k for a new Drifter would be a no brainer!

Posted by jmbo
 - February 18, 2014, 21:03:31 PM

I think the Drifter vs Indian and the whole idea of what-if Kawasaki continued to built Drifters today is an interesting topic.  How would they fair as competition in today's market.  Price wise the $11500 for the 1999 Drifter would run around $16000 in today's dollars comparable to a new Nomad and giving it a small price advantage over the Indian.  No doubt it would have a 1700 motor w/six speed as opposed to the 1800 indian.  Kawasaki might have ditched the driveshaft and "inchworm" suspension in favor of a belt drive and fixed fender.  Maybe some better colors and a better seat and a little more sparkle. The question is would you buy it over the Indian?  Tough call.  Thoughts???

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk