GUEST? Registration opens up many more resources which are not available to guests. Registration is free, we never sell or give others access to your information.
Posted by 49Reo
- September 23, 2013, 09:18:30 AMDue to the configuration of the swingarm/fender mounting, and the Classic and Nomad having steel rear fenders, it is much easier to convert to a full touring model; tourpack, more seats available, etc. Plus, the Nomad having twin disc breaking on the front, provides much more stopping power when bike is configured for a full-on touring bike. Plus, I really like the look of the Nomad, and I think an Indian or Drifter style fender would look good on one; kind of "the best of both bikes".Also, the Nomad has a slightly larger engine displacement, more pipes available, and so on.
But, all that being said, "I ain't gettin' rid of my Drifter!!!" 
Posted by DC
- September 23, 2013, 06:54:03 AMWhat would be the strategy or rationale for getting a Classic or Nomad, as opposed to a Drifter, and modding them. Are they cheaper to begin with?
Posted by 49Reo
- September 22, 2013, 23:12:16 PMI too have been thinking of a Nomad, and putting an "Oldies" front Drifter fender on it. One difference between the Nomad and Drifter, though, is the Drifter has one front caliper and rotor; the Nomad has two.
Posted by greenbarn
- September 22, 2013, 22:31:27 PMThis may sound like sacrilege on the VDR forum, but does anyone know the differences in the Nomad and Classic vs. the Drifter? Don't say "the fenders" - that's obvious. The Nomad has hard bags. There are SO MANY vulcan models. I can look up the specs on wikipedia or something, but more specifically, does anybody know the DISADVANTAGES of a Nomad or Classic vs a Drifter.
I had a thought this evening, that maybe I could find a Classic someday, or a Nomad, and put Drifter fenders on it, and otherwise style it Indian-style somewhat.
Any reason not to go down that path??? Worked for Denny Berg.....