Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Dubliner
 - July 25, 2013, 17:19:55 PM

I've been out of town for two weeks now that I see the bike I think the tank is way too wide for a narrow nosed saddle. Wonder if you could modify the existing one with springs. Oh well back to the drawing board.

Posted by Dubliner
 - July 24, 2013, 18:44:11 PM

Thanks for posting that picture. It's beautiful. Something to model mine after now. What a beautiful bike.

Posted by Troll
 - July 24, 2013, 15:49:33 PM

Well, I think the Singh Saddles are probably going to be closer to the original design than anything else out there....Here's a shot of a restored '53 Roadmaster

Posted by Dubliner
 - July 24, 2013, 15:38:24 PM

I was wondering for those of you with Singh or other Spring Seat single saddles, the horn of the saddle is so much narrower than the tank, does it look a little disproportionate? I was guessing the original indians had a narrow tank at the saddle and it fit properly. While the Spring seats look awesome and thats the look Id love to recreate I wonder if it ever bothers you? TIA Dubliner

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk