Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by pcarrell
 - January 07, 2013, 13:32:36 PM

I've had both on my bike, back to back.  I had the Conti's on first and they were good tires that seemed to last forever.  They're a little harder compound then the 880's, so they aren't as sticky as the 880's, but they're a lot tougher (last longer).  The Conti's also have a little more material in the sidewalls, so they handle a load better, but since you don't ride 2up that's not an issue for you.

Posted by CDNRatMan
 - January 07, 2013, 13:21:10 PM

   After being at the bike show and seeing the tires and such I decided to look at mine, they looked ok the other day but I was now wondering how old they are.
If I am correct they were made in 06. So I found only 2 places in Canada that ship for free and to my house. Shipping from the US is way out to lunch.
Must be WWW tires, and so I have a set from Metzler ME 880 and then from Continental CM2 Conti Milestone. Price is about $10.00 difference between them. Later today or in the week I'll go to the Kaw shop see what they can get me and then the only other shop is a Honda shop check there too, and then see what mounting them is going to run....perhaps leave me waiting for my engine guard.
Anyone got anything bad about either tire or know a better tire? Thanks

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk