Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Troll
 - July 12, 2012, 07:40:30 AM

    This sounds like it might need a decoking treatment before you start to worry about compression. Get a can of Sea Foam and follow the instructions for carbon removal. It isn't so much the actual compression, as it is the variation between cylinders that is worrisome. Recheck after the carbon removal treatment. Compression needs to be checked on a warm engine, with the throttle held wide open for accurate results. Just a side note, my '01, which was abused, neglected, and left to die in a barn, now has 68,000 miles on it and no oil consumption, at all. 36k is still break in mileage!

Posted by sundancevette
 - July 12, 2012, 05:14:01 AM

About 36k, so she is no spring chick.

Posted by greenbarn
 - July 11, 2012, 21:46:42 PM

What kind of mileage is on that bike?

Posted by sundancevette
 - July 11, 2012, 21:40:50 PM

So my 1500 is drinking a little oil and puffs a bit of blue smoke at start up sometimes, so I was thinking valveguides are getting worn.  Well, I did compression anyways and I got 105psi and 130psi on the front and rear cylinders respectively, with two different gages.  Since I believe the max is supposed to be 85psi, I'm wondering if either the top end isn't stock or if the compression releases aren't working out?  Has anyone had any experience with this?  Can't decide if this could effect the oil consumption.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk