We limit access by GUESTS to protect our members from spam, hacks and trolls. Please register to gain access to all our resources.
Hmm Possible oil pump problems? I'm going to guess you might have to split the case to replace the oil pump? Sounds like a big job. Maybe I should look into that... We work on cars (at work), and although we're not "bike mechanics", I think we could handle it, but nobody ( or not many) wants to do a big job like that on their bike unless they have to.
Right now I don't have a lot of plans for either two-up riding or long trips either one, so maybe I'll maybe look towards the 800s. I think I like the looks of the rear shock on the 800 a little better (or lack of looking at them) than the 1500. But I really like the white analog speedo SO much on the 1500 (I've only seen it on early 1500s, anyway). I wonder if it's easy to switch over white speedo on an 800?
I guess bottom line, I'll keep looking for a good deal on one fairly close, so I can at least go look at it and finally see one up close. BTW, obviously with two identical machines, the one in better condition with lower miles should be worth more, no question. However, in realistic terms, should I consider much difference in say 10,000 miles or 20,000 miles?? A couple friends have said up to 20K is still really low miles for an asian bike. Obviously, there are a some 5000 mile bikes out there for sale, but a lot of times at a premium, or 'not in my neighborhood'.
Sorry about all the questions, but I tend to over-analyze stuff when I go for a big purchase...
Tracy.
Some of the earlier Vulcan engines (which the 1500 Drifter has, not sure about the 800) had an oil pump problem; they had a plastic gear in them which could fail; Kawasaki was doing a recall on them for awhile if my memory serves me correctly. Chief, do you have any more info on that issue?
Regards and such,
49Reo
P.S. Happy hunting!
The 800 is a bit smaller - weight wise at least. But, in all honesty, I'm not sure there is a significant difference in the "feel" - the 1500 is a heavy bike, especially after 8 hours on the road!
If you are going to ride two-up most of the time, or if you plan to do long distance riding - I'd go with the 1500. If none of that is in your future, the 800 will work fine.Chief thanks for taking time to reply. I hear what you're saying about the differences in the 800 vs 1500. I guess the bottom line is I don't know enough to KNOW which one I want. I mean as a first time bike buyer, would it really be smart to just go with the smaller 800? I know I don't "need" the bigger CC's, but is the 1500 a huge deal to handle, vs the 800, size and power wise? I realize the carb and chain = more maintenance, but honestly not having owned a bike (I've owned numerous quads, all carb and chain over the years, all the way from racers to utility) , I don't know if the advantages of the shaft/FI far outweigh the disadvantages??
I wish there was a way to test drive a couple dozen... If I were shopping for an F-250 vs. a Ranger, I'd just go check out a couple local Ford dealers and look at a few. But there are so few Drifters around for sale, I'm planning on needing to drive quite a ways to look at any, so I thought if I could at least narrow it down, I'd be way ahead.
800 vs 1500 - these are really VERY different bikes... 800 = chain, carb; 1500= EFI/Shaft - If lower CC's, chain and carb are what you want... 800, otherwise 1500.
Years - 99/00 - blacked out, smaller gas tanks, other cosmetic differences. 01 and later - 5 gallon tank, cosmetic updates, some internal improvements. I think 2004 1500 had an oil filter recall, so you have to have to use a different oil filter setup - more expensive to change the oil. If you like blacked out look and don't mind the smaller fuel tank... 99/00... otherwise a later model is what you want.I want to buy a drifter this winter, but I can't figure out if I want an 800 or 1500, and I don't know which year. As a first-time bike owner, shouldI only consider an 800? I've ridden several friend's bikes over the years, but never owned one. I don't think I really "need" the extra CC's, but on the other hand the fuel injection, shaft drive look attractive, and I REALLY LIKE the white speedos, which were (I believe) only on the early 1500's? I realize it's a personal choice, but any advice anyone could give would be appreciated.
Second decision: Which year/years?? Obviously, lower miles is better depending on condition, of course. But are there any other considerations as to what year(s) are better or any problems with some years, or anything like that? I already mentioned, I really like the analog speedo better, but maybe the analog can be retofitted on a newer one??? Are the 99-2000 models, with the blacked out forks worth more for collector's value, or anything like that?
Any big advantages to getting a later model (aside from lower miles/better conditoin???)
I know these decisions are different for each rider, so I need to add some other info: Like I said I'm a first time bike buyer. I plan to ride this to work in the summer, and I only live 3 miles from work, so I don't need to put huge amounts of miles on it. I don't usually have a huge amount of free time in the summer, so I don't have any allusions of doing huge amounts of riding. The wife doesn't have much interest. I would like to spend as little as possible on the bike. Also, there's a good chance I'll do some custom work, and probably paint it over the winter (I have a red/ off-white two-tone scheme in mind). Also, I have an auto repair shop, and we're capable of doing any repair maintenance required - but I don't necessarily really want something that will require a lot of continuous maintenance down the road, either.
Thanks in advance for any input - There are a lot available and if I could narrow it down a little it would be great!!!
Page created in 0.063 seconds with 12 queries.