Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by aclone
 - October 05, 2009, 12:31:06 PM

What was it about 5 or 6 years ago you had to trade in a Harley to buy a Harley?  I guess we as americans just love our brand names.
Mark

Posted by chief
 - October 05, 2009, 11:23:36 AM

I've always had at least one HD in my garage... until 2004. I have two metrics now.

There were three factors which caused the change for me:

1) Lack of HD loyalty to long time customers
2) Technology
3) Boring, boring, boring looks.

Cheers

Posted by aclone
 - October 05, 2009, 08:20:25 AM

I agree it's the same argument I have with the H D guys you get so much more bang for your buck with the metric bikes.  Even if your not a retro fan the Drifter has that classic look and feel.  The best part is I ride mine everywhere even if its just up to the hardware store and I don't  have to worry about what if.
Mark

Posted by chief
 - October 04, 2009, 14:11:03 PM

I guess you could be right... but it really doesn't matter how it looks if it just sits in the garage.

Just because I can afford one doesn't mean I'm willing to spend my money unwisely. Drifters look as good or better... so if its just about looks - we win. <LOL>

Cheers.

Posted by aclone
 - October 03, 2009, 14:13:40 PM

It's more like look at me, when you have that kind of money it's all about the reaction.
Mark

Posted by chief
 - October 02, 2009, 15:58:37 PM

Absolutely... a REAL Indian is an investment - even if you ride it. Any of the "new" Indians can't be seriously considered to be an investment IMHO.

Cheers.

Posted by pcarrell
 - October 02, 2009, 15:08:07 PM

Several Drifters are a far better buy if you want to ride.  If you want to invest, they still might be a better buy!

What I don't get, is if someone has that kind of change, why not buy a REAL Indian and have serious investment potential?  I mean, lets face it.....I['m guessing a large portion of the people buying the new Indian aren't going to put 200 miles a year on it.  In the meantime, the value of that new bike drops like a stone.  The real Indian will only go up in value.

Sorry, I didn't mean to make sense......

Posted by aclone
 - October 02, 2009, 14:38:23 PM

Or you could buy a drifter for everyday of the week and not be to much over $30,000.00. It's a very pretty bike but that's about it.
Mark

Posted by chief
 - October 02, 2009, 13:48:29 PM

Did you know the new $30,000+ Indian Chief uses a harley evo engine clone and that it is NOT rubber mounted.

Geez, Indian its retro STYLING - NOT retro technology!!!  ;D

Cheers.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk