We limit access by GUESTS to protect our members from spam, hacks and trolls. Please register to gain access to all our resources.
Posted by chief
- October 04, 2009, 14:11:03 PMI guess you could be right... but it really doesn't matter how it looks if it just sits in the garage.
Just because I can afford one doesn't mean I'm willing to spend my money unwisely. Drifters look as good or better... so if its just about looks - we win. <LOL>
Cheers.
Posted by aclone
- October 03, 2009, 14:13:40 PMIt's more like look at me, when you have that kind of money it's all about the reaction.
Mark
Posted by chief
- October 02, 2009, 15:58:37 PMAbsolutely... a REAL Indian is an investment - even if you ride it. Any of the "new" Indians can't be seriously considered to be an investment IMHO.
Cheers.
Posted by pcarrell
- October 02, 2009, 15:08:07 PMSeveral Drifters are a far better buy if you want to ride. If you want to invest, they still might be a better buy!
What I don't get, is if someone has that kind of change, why not buy a REAL Indian and have serious investment potential? I mean, lets face it.....I['m guessing a large portion of the people buying the new Indian aren't going to put 200 miles a year on it. In the meantime, the value of that new bike drops like a stone. The real Indian will only go up in value.
Sorry, I didn't mean to make sense......
Posted by aclone
- October 02, 2009, 14:38:23 PMOr you could buy a drifter for everyday of the week and not be to much over $30,000.00. It's a very pretty bike but that's about it.
Mark
Posted by chief
- October 02, 2009, 13:48:29 PMDid you know the new $30,000+ Indian Chief uses a harley evo engine clone and that it is NOT rubber mounted.
Geez, Indian its retro STYLING - NOT retro technology!!! 
Cheers.