Modify message

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 180 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 6 per post (6 remaining), maximum total size 64.00 MB, maximum individual size 29.30 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by aclone
 - October 03, 2009, 14:13:40 PM

It's more like look at me, when you have that kind of money it's all about the reaction.
Mark

Posted by chief
 - October 02, 2009, 15:58:37 PM

Absolutely... a REAL Indian is an investment - even if you ride it. Any of the "new" Indians can't be seriously considered to be an investment IMHO.

Cheers.

Posted by pcarrell
 - October 02, 2009, 15:08:07 PM

Several Drifters are a far better buy if you want to ride.  If you want to invest, they still might be a better buy!

What I don't get, is if someone has that kind of change, why not buy a REAL Indian and have serious investment potential?  I mean, lets face it.....I['m guessing a large portion of the people buying the new Indian aren't going to put 200 miles a year on it.  In the meantime, the value of that new bike drops like a stone.  The real Indian will only go up in value.

Sorry, I didn't mean to make sense......

Posted by aclone
 - October 02, 2009, 14:38:23 PM

Or you could buy a drifter for everyday of the week and not be to much over $30,000.00. It's a very pretty bike but that's about it.
Mark

Posted by chief
 - October 02, 2009, 13:48:29 PM

Did you know the new $30,000+ Indian Chief uses a harley evo engine clone and that it is NOT rubber mounted.

Geez, Indian its retro STYLING - NOT retro technology!!!  ;D

Cheers.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk